Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472930›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessment of Sepsis Risk at Admission to the Emergency Department: Clinical Interpretable Prediction Model.

Umran Aygun, Fatma Hilal Yagin, Burak Yagin, Seyma Yasar, Cemil Colak, Ahmet Selim Ozkan, Luca Paolo Ardigò

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Umran AygunDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Malatya Yesilyurt Hasan Calık State Hospital, Malatya 44929, Turkey.
Fatma Hilal YaginDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya 44280, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9848-7958
Burak YaginDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya 44280, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6687-979X
Seyma YasarDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya 44280, Turkey.
Cemil ColakDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya 44280, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5406-098X
Ahmet Selim OzkanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Malatya Turgut Ozal University School of Medicine, Malatya 44210, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4543-8853
Luca Paolo ArdigòDepartment of Teacher Education, NLA University College, 0166 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7677-5070
Inonu University · TRMalatya Devlet Hastanesi · TRNLA University College · NOTurgut Özal University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop an interpretable prediction model based on explainable artificial intelligence to predict bacterial sepsis and discover important biomarkers. A total of 1572 adult patients, 560 of whom were sepsis positive and 1012 of whom were negative, who were admitted to the emergency department with suspicion of sepsis, were examined. We investigated the performance characteristics of sepsis biomarkers alone and in combination for confirmed sepsis diagnosis using Sepsis-3 criteria. Three different tree-based algorithms-Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost)-were used for sepsis prediction, and after examining comprehensive performance metrics, descriptions of the optimal model were obtained with the SHAP method. The XGBoost model achieved accuracy of 0.898 (0.868-0.929) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.940 (0.898-0.980) with a 95% confidence interval. The five biomarkers for predicting sepsis were age, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, procalcitonin, and positive blood culture. SHAP results revealed that older age, higher respiratory rate, procalcitonin, neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio, C-reactive protein, plaque, leukocyte particle concentration, as well as lower oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin levels increased the risk of sepsis. As a result, the Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)-based prediction model can guide clinicians in the early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis, providing more effective sepsis management and potentially reducing mortality rates and medical costs.

Indexed as

biomarkerexplainable artificial intelligencemachine learningsepsis

Identifiers

PMID38472930
PMCPMC10931325
OpenAlexW4391960726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.