Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472886›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Confronting Views of Companies and Authorities on Food Safety Issues-A Cross-Country Survey.

Ilija Djekic, Garegin Hambardzumyan, Aleksandra Nikolić, Alen Mujčinović, Dimitar Nakov, Aleksandra Silovska Nikolova, Anastasia A Semenova, Oksana A Kuznetsova, Fatih Oz, Emel Oz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ilija DjekicFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-8299
Garegin HambardzumyanVeterinary Sanitary Examination, Food Safety and Hygiene Department, Armenian National Agrarian University, Yerevan 0009, Armenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1942-7819
Aleksandra NikolićFaculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0002-7507-4042
Alen MujčinovićFaculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0001-5493-7622
Dimitar NakovFaculty of Agriculture, "Goce Delčev" University in Štip, 2000 Shtip, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0001-6159-5595
Aleksandra Silovska NikolovaFaculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food, SS Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, 1000 Shtip, North Macedonia.
Anastasia A SemenovaV. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems, Moscow 107023, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4372-6448
Oksana A KuznetsovaV. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems, Moscow 107023, Russia.
Fatih OzFaculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25030, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5300-7519
Emel OzFaculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25030, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3766-2713
Nino TerjungDIL German Institute of Food Technology, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0668-0644
Heinz VolkerDIL German Institute of Food Technology, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany.
Igor TomasevicFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-1611-2264

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated food safety issues as perceived by food companies and food safety authorities in six countries in Europe and Central Asia. A total of 66 companies and 16 authorities participated in the survey. The results provide important insights related to what the main food safety priorities are, how they are addressed in the countries that participated in the survey, and what the role of the main stakeholders is in the food value chain. Almost 50% of food companies identified 'food fraud' as the most influential food safety attribute. One-third of food safety authorities recognized 'food safety management system' as the most influential food safety attribute. Principal component analysis separated food safety statements into two dimensions named 'food safety hazards and risks' and 'food safety system'. Although there are slight differences in food safety statements between the two stakeholders, i.e., food companies and food safety authorities, it is the country of origin that plays a more important role in understanding their views. Food companies will need to implement a systemic approach and transform the entire food value chain continuum while considering new food safety challenges. It is expected that food safety authorities will have to play a more proactive role in the future.

Indexed as

food safetyfood safety integrityfood safety knowledgefood value chain

Identifiers

PMID38472886
PMCPMC10931428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.