ReviewIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2024
Secondary Publication: Proposal for Points of Consideration for Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture.
Review in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unidirectional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate supports three-dimensional osteogenic differentiation of human iPS cells without surface coating.Bone reports · 2026Article
- Secondary Publication: Proposal for Points of Consideration for Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human pluripotent stem cells, such as human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent stem cells, are used in basic research and various applied fields, including drug discovery and regenerative medicine. Stem cell technologies have developed rapidly in recent years, and the supply of culture materials has improved. This has facilitated the culture of human pluripotent stem cells and has enabled an increasing number of researchers and bioengineers to access this technology. At the same time, it is a challenge to share the basic concepts and techniques of this technology among researchers and technicians to ensure the reproducibility of research results. Human pluripotent stem cells differ from conventional somatic cells in many aspects, and many points need to be considered in their handling, even for those experienced in cell culture. Therefore, we have prepared this proposal, "Points of Consideration for Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture," to promote the effective use of human pluripotent stem cells. This proposal includes seven items to be considered and practices to be confirmed before using human pluripotent stem cells. These are laws/guidelines and consent/material transfer agreements, diversity of pluripotent stem cells, culture materials, thawing procedure, media exchange and cell passaging, freezing procedure, and culture management. We aim for the concept of these points of consideration to be shared by researchers and technicians involved in the cell culture of pluripotent stem cells. In this way, we hope the reliability of research using pluripotent stem cells can be improved, and cell culture technology will advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.