Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472687›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2024

Biomechanical analysis of the maxillary sinus floor membrane during internal sinus floor elevation with implants at different angles of the maxillary sinus angles.

Yinxin Deng, Ruihong Ma, Yilin He, Shujia Yu, Shiyu Cao, Kang Gao, Yiping Dou, Pan Ma

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yinxin DengDental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China.
Ruihong MaDental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China.
Yilin HeDental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China.
Shujia YuDental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China.
Shiyu CaoDental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China.
Kang GaoDental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China.
Yiping DouDental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China.
Pan MaDental Implant Center, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, 4 Tiantan Xili, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100050, China. mapanxw@163.com.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Chang'an Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation L222088Innovation Research Team Project of Beijing Stomatological Hospital CXTD202204National Natural Science Foundation of China 81974153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study analyzed and compared the biomechanical properties of maxillary sinus floor mucosa with implants at three different maxillary sinus angles during a modified internal sinus floor elevation procedure.

methods3D reconstruction of the implant, maxillary sinus bone, and membrane were performed. The maxillary sinus model was set at three different angles. Two internal maxillary sinus elevation models were established, and finite element analysis was used to simulate the modified maxillary sinus elevation process. The implant was elevated to 10 mm at three maxillary sinus angles when the maxillary sinus floor membrane was separated by 0 and 4 mm. The stress of the maxillary sinus floor membrane was analyzed and compared.

resultsWhen the maxillary sinus floor membrane was separated by 0 mm and elevated to 10 mm, the peak stress values of the implant on the maxillary sinus floor membrane at three different angles were as follows: maxillary sinus I: 5.14-78.32 MPa; maxillary sinus II: 2.81-73.89 MPa; and maxillary sinus III: 2.82-51.87 MPa. When the maxillary sinus floor membrane was separated by 4 mm and elevated to 10 mm, the corresponding values were as follows: maxillary sinus I: 0.50-7.25 MPa; maxillary sinus II: 0.81-16.55 MPa; and maxillary sinus III: 0.49-22.74 MPa.

conclusionThe risk of sinus floor membrane rupture is greatly reduced after adequate dissection of the maxillary sinus floor membrane when performing modified internal sinus elevation in a narrow maxillary sinus. In a wide maxillary sinus, the risk of rupture or perforation of the wider maxillary sinus floor is reduced, regardless of whether traditional or modified internal sinus elevation is performed at the same height.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsSinus Floor AugmentationDental Implantation, EndosseousMaxillary SinusMembranesDental ImplantsFinite element analysisInternal sinus elevationMaxillary sinus angle (anatomy)Sinus floor membrane

Identifiers

PMID38472687
PMCPMC10933249
OpenAlexW4392716799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.