ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024
Detection of femoropopliteal arterial steno-occlusion at MR angiography: initial experience with artificial intelligence.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning-Based Diagnosis of Femoropopliteal Artery Steno-Occlusion Using Maximum Intensity Projection Images of CT Angiography.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Imaging Characterisation of Peripheral Artery Disease: A Scoping Review on Current Classifications and New Insights Brought by Artificial Intelligence.EJVES vascular forum · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated a deep learning (DL) algorithm for detecting vessel steno-occlusions in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It utilised a private dataset, which was acquired and annotated by the authors through their institution and subsequently validated by two blinded readers.
methodsA single-centre retrospective study analysed 105 magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images using an EfficientNet B0 DL model. Initially, inter-reader variability was assessed using the complete dataset. For a subset of these images (29 from the left side and 35 from the right side) where digital subtraction angiography (DSA) data was available as the ground truth, the model's accuracy and the area under the curve at receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROC-AUC) were evaluated.
resultsA total of 105 patient examinations (mean age, 75 years ±12 [mean ± standard deviation], 61 men) were evaluated. Radiologist-DL model agreement had a quadratic weighted Cohen κ ≥ 0.72 (left side) and ≥ 0.66 (right side). Radiologist inter-reader agreement was ≥ 0.90 (left side) and ≥ 0.87 (right side). The DL model achieved a 0.897 accuracy and a 0.913 ROC-AUC (left side) and 0.743 and 0.830 (right side). Radiologists achieved 0.931 and 0.862 accuracies, with 0.930 and 0.861 ROC-AUCs (left side), and 0.800 and 0.799 accuracies, with 0.771 ROC-AUCs (right side).
conclusionThe DL model provided valid results in identifying arterial steno-occlusion in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries on MRA among PAD patients. However, it did not reach the inter-reader agreement of two radiologists. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The tested DL model is a promising tool for assisting in the detection of arterial steno-occlusion in patients with PAD, but further optimisation is necessary to provide radiologists with useful support in their daily routine diagnostics. KEY POINTS: • This study focused on the application of DL for arterial steno-occlusion detection in lower extremities on MRA. • A previously developed DL model was tested for accuracy and inter-reader agreement. • While the model showed promising results, it does not yet replace human expertise in detecting arterial steno-occlusion on MRA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.