ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024
Live birth outcomes following single-step blastocyst warming technique - optimizing efficiency without impacting live birth rates.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06741748 (A Pragmatic, Multi-centre, Double-blinded, Two-arm Randomized Controlled Trial on a Direct Warming Frozen Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technologies Treatment Outcome), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pragmatic, Multi-centre, Double-blinded, Two-arm Randomized Controlled Trial on a Direct Warming Frozen Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technologies Treatment Outcome
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics and developmental comparison of direct and conventional warming methods in vitrified human and mouse cleavage-stage embryos.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- One-step warming procedure improves embryonic development of vitrified mouse oocytes by mitigating mitochondrial damage.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of a one-step warming protocol of vitrified blastocyst stage embryos.F&S reports · 2026Article
- Article
- A one-step short rehydration protocol for warming is associated with live birth outcomes in frozen blastocyst transfers: a retrospective cohort study.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Validation and clinical study of single-step vitrification combined with single-step warming of human blastocysts.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Improved clinical outcomes with a modified warming protocol in donor oocyte cycles.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- The nexus between gamete donation and cryobiology in ARTs: Avoiding the unavoidable.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- The new ice age: the promise and challenges of rapid oocyte warming protocols.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the impact of a single-step (SS) warming versus standard warming (SW) protocol on the survival/expansion of vitrified blastocysts and their clinical outcomes post-frozen embryo transfer (FET).
methodsRetrospective analysis was performed on 200 vitrified/warmed research blastocysts equally divided amongst two thawing protocols utilizing the Fujifilm Warming NX kits (Fujifilm, CA). SW utilized the standard 14-minute manufacturer's guidelines. SS protocol required only a one-minute immersion in thaw solution (TS) before the embryos were transferred to culture media. A time-interrupted study was performed evaluating 752 FETs (SW: 376 FETs, SS 376 FETs) between April 2021-December 2022 at a single academic fertility clinic in Boston, Massachusetts. Embryologic, clinical pregnancy, and live birth outcomes were assessed using generalized estimated equation (GEE) models, which accounted for potential confounders.
resultsThere was 100% survival for all blastocysts (n = 952 embryos) with no differences in blastocyst re-expansion regardless of PGT status. Adjusted analysis showed no differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, or biochemical pregnancy rate. A higher odds of multiple gestation [AdjOR(95%CI) 1.06 (1.01, 1.11), p = 0.019] were noted, even when adjusting for number of embryos transferred [AdjOR(95%CI) 1.05 (1.01, 1.10)]. Live birth outcomes showed no differences in live birth rates or birthweight at delivery.
conclusionsThe study found equivalent outcomes for SS and SW in all parameters except for a slight rise in the rate of multiple gestations. The results suggest that SS warming is an efficient, viable alternative to SW, reducing thaw times without adverse effects on live birth rates or neonatal birth weights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.