Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472499›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2024

External validation of a deep learning model for predicting bone mineral density on chest radiographs.

Takamune Asamoto, Yasuhiko Takegami, Yoichi Sato, Shunsuke Takahara, Norio Yamamoto, Naoya Inagaki, Satoshi Maki, Mitsuru Saito, Shiro Imagama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Explainable opportunistic osteoporosis screening from chest X-rays: a retrospective comparison of foundation models.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Takamune AsamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-3093-9470
Yasuhiko TakegamiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan. takegami.yasuhiko.k3@f.mail.nagoya-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-9279-8301
Yoichi SatoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6144-3735
Shunsuke TakaharaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kakogawa Medical Center, Kakogawa, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1758-7672
Norio YamamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Miyamoto Orthopaedic Hospital, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-9994
Naoya InagakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4045-3616
Satoshi MakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6809-3771
Mitsuru SaitoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1653-4309
Shiro ImagamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6951-8575
Nagoya University · JPChiba University · JPEdogawa Hospital · JPJikei University Kashiwa hospital · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKumamoto Orthopedic Surgery Hospital · JPNagoya University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a new model for predicting bone mineral density on chest radiographs and externally validated it using images captured at facilities other than the development environment. The model performed well and showed potential for clinical use. PURPOSE: In this study, we performed external validation (EV) of a developed deep learning model for predicting bone mineral density (BMD) of femoral neck on chest radiographs to verify the usefulness of this model in clinical practice.

methodsThis study included patients who visited any of the collaborating facilities from 2010 to 2020 and underwent chest radiography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the femoral neck in the year before and after their visit. A total of 50,114 chest radiographs were obtained, and BMD was measured using DXA. We developed the model with 47,150 images from 17 facilities and performed EV with 2914 images from three other facilities (EV dataset). We trained the deep learning model via ensemble learning based on chest radiographs, age, and sex to predict BMD using regression. The outcomes were the correlation of the predicted BMD and measured BMD with diagnoses of osteoporosis and osteopenia using the T-score estimated from the predicted BMD.

resultsThe mean BMD was 0.64±0.14 g/cm

conclusionOur model, which was externally validated using data obtained at facilities other than the development environment, predicted BMD of femoral neck on chest radiographs. The model performed well and showed potential for clinical use.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityHumansRadiographyBone analysis/quantitationBone disordersBone mineral densityChest radiographyOsteoporosisScreening

Identifiers

PMID38472499
OpenAlexW4392742978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.