Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472458›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2024

Migratory Shorebird Gut Microbes are not Associated with Bivalve Prey in Monsoon Tropical Australia.

Chava L Weitzman, Zarah Tinning, Kimberley A Day, Stephen T Garnett, Keith Christian, Karen Gibb

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chava L WeitzmanResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, NT, Australia. chava.weitzman@cdu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-1885
Zarah TinningResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, NT, Australia.
Kimberley A DayResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, NT, Australia.
Stephen T GarnettResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, NT, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-7060
Keith ChristianResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, NT, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6135-1670
Karen GibbResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, NT, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-883X
Charles Darwin University · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP210102176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migratory animals can carry symbionts over long distances. While well-studied for parasite and pathogen transmission, less is known about use of this route by other symbiotic taxa, particularly those non-pathogenic. Here we ask the question of whether gut bacteria can be spread between continents by long-distance bird migration, although gut microbiomes in birds may not be as stable or persistent as those of non-volant animals. We used amplicon sequencing of both bacterial 16S rRNA gene and Vibrio-centric hsp60 gene to determine whether the faecal bacteria of migratory great knots (Calidris tenuirostris) also occur in their main food source in Northern Australia or in nearby sand, comparing samples before and after the birds' long-distance migration. Our data suggest that there is little connectivity among the bacterial microbiomes, except in the bivalve prey. Our results are consistent with previous studies finding that bird faecal microbiomes were not host-specific and contrast with those showing an influence of diet on bird faecal bacteria. We also found little connectivity among Vibrio spp. However, although faecal sample sizes were small, the dominance of different individual Vibrio spp. suggests that they may have been well-established in knot guts and thus capable of moving with them on migration. We suggest that the physiological impacts of a long-distance migration may have caused shifts in the phyla comprising great knot faecal communities.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsAustraliaBacteriaBirdsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38472458
PMCPMC10933140
OpenAlexW4392720574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.