Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Hybrid physics-machine learning models for predicting rate of penetration in the Halahatang oil field, Tarim Basin.

Shengjie Jiao, Wei Li, Zhuolun Li, Jingming Gai, Linhao Zou, Yinao Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shengjie JiaoSchool of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China.
Wei LiSchool of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China. our.126@126.com.
Zhuolun LiSchool of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China.
Jingming GaiSchool of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China.
Linhao ZouSchool of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China.
Yinao SuSchool of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China. suyinaonepu@126.com.

Funding

Heilongjiang Provincial Government and Daqing Oilfield unveiled the first batch of key scientific and technological research projects DQYT-2022-JS-750National Natural Science Foundation of China 51774093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rate of penetration (ROP) is a key factor in drilling optimization, cost reduction and drilling cycle shortening. Due to the systematicity, complexity and uncertainty of drilling operations, however, it has always been a problem to establish a highly accurate and interpretable ROP prediction model to guide and optimize drilling operations. To solve this problem in the Tarim Basin, this study proposes four categories of hybrid physics-machine learning (ML) methods for modeling. One of which is residual modeling, in which an ML model learns to predict errors or residuals, via a physical model; the second is integrated coupling, in which the output of the physical model is used as an input to the ML model; the third is simple average, in which predictions from both the physical model and the ML model are combined; and the last is bootstrap aggregating (bagging), which follows the idea of ensemble learning to combine different physical models' advantages. A total of 5655 real data points from the Halahatang oil field were used to test the performance of the various models. The results showed that the residual modeling model, with an R

Indexed as

Hybrid modelMachine learningPhysical modelPrediction of the rate of penetration

Identifiers

PMID38472418
PMCPMC10933403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.