Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472373›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2024

Identifying key factors for predicting O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status in adult patients with diffuse glioma: a multimodal analysis of demographics, radiomics, and MRI by variable Vision Transformer.

Takuma Usuzaki, Kengo Takahashi, Ryusei Inamori, Yohei Morishita, Takashi Shizukuishi, Hidenobu Takagi, Mami Ishikuro, Taku Obara, Kei Takase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting MGMT Promoter Methylation in Glioblastoma Using MR Imaging: A Systematic Review.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Takuma UsuzakiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan. takuma.usuzaki.p6@dc.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3945-3432
Kengo TakahashiTohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan.
Ryusei InamoriTohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan.
Yohei MorishitaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Takashi ShizukuishiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Hidenobu TakagiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Mami IshikuroTohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Molecular Epidemiology, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan.
Taku ObaraTohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Molecular Epidemiology, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Miyagi, 980-8573, Japan.
Kei TakaseDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to perform multimodal analysis by vision transformer (vViT) in predicting O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase (MGMT) promoter status among adult patients with diffuse glioma using demographics (sex and age), radiomic features, and MRI.

methodsThe training and test datasets contained 122 patients with 1,570 images and 30 patients with 484 images, respectively. The radiomic features were extracted from enhancing tumors (ET), necrotic tumor cores (NCR), and the peritumoral edematous/infiltrated tissues (ED) using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI) and T2-weighted images (T2WI). The vViT had 9 sectors; 1 demographic sector, 6 radiomic sectors (CE-T1WI ET, CE-T1WI NCR, CE-T1WI ED, T2WI ET, T2WI NCR, and T2WI ED), 2 image sectors (CE-T1WI, and T2WI). Accuracy and area under the curve of receiver-operating characteristics (AUC-ROC) were calculated for the test dataset. The performance of vViT was compared with AlexNet, GoogleNet, VGG16, and ResNet by McNemar and Delong test. Permutation importance (PI) analysis with the Mann-Whitney U test was performed.

resultsThe accuracy was 0.833 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.714-0.877) and the area under the curve of receiver-operating characteristics was 0.840 (0.650-0.995) in the patient-based analysis. The vViT had higher accuracy than VGG16 and ResNet, and had higher AUC-ROC than GoogleNet (p<0.05). The ED radiomic features extracted from the T2-weighted image demonstrated the highest importance (PI=0.239, 95%CI: 0.237-0.240) among all other sectors (p<0.0001).

conclusionThe vViT is a competent deep learning model in predicting MGMT status. The ED radiomic features of the T2-weighted image demonstrated the most dominant contribution.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaAdultDemographyGuanineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesGuanineO-(6)-methylguaninedeep learninggliomaO6-methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase (MGMT)variable vision transformer (vViT)vision transformer (ViT)

Identifiers

PMID38472373
PMCPMC11031474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.