Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472341›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024

Techniques for Registration of Myoelectric Activity of Women's Pelvic Floor Muscles: A Scoping Review.

Josepha Karinne de Oliveira Ferro, Andrea Lemos, Alessandra Carolina de Santana Chagas, Alexa Alves de Moraes, Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza, Daniella Araújo de Oliveira

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Josepha Karinne de Oliveira FerroDepartment of Physical Therapy, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Jorn. Aníbal Fernandes, 173 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco, 50740-560, Brazil.
Andrea LemosDepartment of Physical Therapy, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Jorn. Aníbal Fernandes, 173 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco, 50740-560, Brazil.
Alessandra Carolina de Santana ChagasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Jorn. Aníbal Fernandes, 173 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco, 50740-560, Brazil.
Alexa Alves de MoraesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Jorn. Aníbal Fernandes, 173 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco, 50740-560, Brazil.
Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-SouzaUniversity of Applied Sciences, Hochschule Osnabrück, Caprivi Strasse 30, Room 0017, Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7825-2676
Daniella Araújo de OliveiraDepartment of Physical Therapy, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Av. Jorn. Aníbal Fernandes, 173 - Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco, 50740-560, Brazil. daniella.aoliveira@ufpe.br.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRHochschule Osnabrück · DE

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisSurface electromyography is commonly applied to measure the electrophysiological activity of the neuromuscular system. However, there is no consensus regarding the best protocol to assess pelvic floor muscles.

methodsA scoping literature review was carried out in six databases, using MeSH descriptors. It included studies with electromyographic assessment in adult women presenting or not with pelvic floor dysfunction. The results were presented in categories to contribute to the development of a protocol considering the most used parameters for non-invasive assessment of myoelectric activity of pelvic floor muscles.

resultsA total of 1,074 articles were identified, and 146 studies were selected for analysis. The intravaginal probe was used in 80.8% of the studies, the bipolar sensor with metallic plates placed on both sides of the vagina was the most frequent (71.3%), with a reference electrode positioned on the anterior superior iliac spine (33.5%). The supine position with hip and knee flexed (45.2%) was the most frequent position used. Of the studies, 44.5% normalized the data by maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) whereas 44.5% performed an average of 3 MVCs.

conclusionsThe most frequently used protocol for the pelvic floor is the bipolar intracavitary probe with metal plates positioned at 3-9 o'clock and introduced distally to the vaginal introitus with the volunteer in the supine position and the hip and knee flexed with the reference placed on the anterior-superior iliac spine.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyPelvic FloorFemaleHumansMuscle ContractionPelvic Floor DisordersElectromyographyEvaluatedFemalePelvic floor muscles

Identifiers

PMID38472341
OpenAlexW4392693505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.