Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472336›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2024

Determination of the Combined Effects of Asian Herbal Medicine with Calcium and/or Vitamin D Supplements on Bone Mineral Density in Primary Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hee-Joo Park, Min-Gyeong Kim, Young-Seo Yoo, Boram Lee, Yu-Jin Choi, Chang-Gue Son, Eun-Jung Lee

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hee-Joo ParkCollege of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, 62, Daehak-Ro, Dong-Gu, Daejeon, 34520, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0194-6816
Min-Gyeong KimCollege of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, 62, Daehak-Ro, Dong-Gu, Daejeon, 34520, Republic of Korea.
Young-Seo YooCollege of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, 62, Daehak-Ro, Dong-Gu, Daejeon, 34520, Republic of Korea.
Boram LeeKM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, 34054, Republic of Korea.
Yu-Jin ChoiInstitute of Bioscience and Integrative Medicine, Daejeon University, 62 Daehak-Ro, Dong-Gu, Daejeon, 34520, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Gue SonReseacrch Center for CFS/ME in Daejeon University, 75, Daedukdae-Ro 176, Seo-Gu, Daejeon, 35235, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Jung LeeDepartment of Korean Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, 62, Daehak-Ro, Dong-Gu, Daejeon, 34520, Republic of Korea. jungkahn@dju.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-9694
Daejeon University · KRKorea Institute of Oriental Medicine · KR

Funding

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology NRF-2021R1A2C2013483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our review of 52 RCTs from 5 databases suggests a tendency for notable improvement in BMD when combining herbal medicine with supplements (calcium and vitamin D variants) compared to supplement monotherapy in primary osteoporosis. However, caution is needed in interpreting results due to substantial heterogeneity among included studies. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether herbal medicine (HM) plus supplements such as calcium (Ca) or vitamin D (Vit.D) improves bone mineral density (BMD) compared to supplements alone in primary osteoporosis (OP) patients.

methodsWe searched 5 databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using HMs with supplements (Ca or Vit.D variants) as interventions for primary OP patients published until August 31, 2022. Meta-analysis using BMD score as the primary outcome was performed using RevMan 5.4 version. Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed useing RoB 2.0 tool.

resultsIn total, 52 RCTs involving 4,889 participants (1,408 men, 3,481 women) were included, with average BMD scores of 0.690 ± 0.095 g/cm

conclusionOur data suggest that combining of HM and supplements tends to be more effective in improving BMD in primary OP than supplements alone. However, caution is needed in interpretation due to the reporting bias and high heterogeneity among studies, and well-designed RCTs are required in the future.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumDietary SupplementsOsteoporosisVitamin DDrugs, Chinese HerbalDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumDrugs, Chinese HerbalVitamin DCalciumHerbal medicineMeta-analysisPrimary osteoporosisSystematic reviewVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID38472336
PMCPMC11652406
OpenAlexW4392755377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.