Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472324›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of enriched environment on motor performance and learning in mice.

S Dijkhuizen, L M C Van Ginneken, A H C IJpelaar, S K E Koekkoek, C I De Zeeuw, H J Boele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S DijkhuizenDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L M C Van GinnekenDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A H C IJpelaarDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
S K E KoekkoekDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
C I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.dezeeuw@erasmusmc.nl.
H J BoeleDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. h.boele@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

European Research Council #737619ZonMw #91618112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience heavily relies on animal welfare in laboratory rodents as it can significantly affect brain development, cognitive function and memory formation. Unfortunately, laboratory animals are often raised in artificial environments devoid of physical and social stimuli, potentially leading to biased outcomes in behavioural assays. To assess this effect, we examined the impact of social and physical cage enrichment on various forms of motor coordination. Our findings indicate that while enriched-housed animals did not exhibit faster learning in eyeblink conditioning, the peak timing of their conditioned responses was slightly, but significantly, improved. Additionally, enriched-housed animals outperformed animals that were housed in standard conditions in the accelerating rotarod and ErasmusLadder test. In contrast, we found no significant effect of enrichment on the balance beam and grip strength test. Overall, our data suggest that an enriched environment can improve motor performance and motor learning under challenging and/or novel circumstances, possibly reflecting an altered state of anxiety.

Indexed as

EnvironmentMotor ActivityAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryBehavior, AnimalConditioning, ClassicalLearningMaze LearningMiceCage enrichmentDelay eyeblink conditioningErasmusLadderMicePhysical enrichmentRotarodSocial enrichment

Identifiers

PMID38472324
PMCPMC10933351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.