Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472270›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

Characterising user engagement with mHealth for chronic disease self-management and impact on machine learning performance.

Christopher Duckworth, Bethany Cliffe, Brian Pickering, Ben Ainsworth, Alison Blythin, Adam Kirk, Thomas M A Wilkinson, Michael J Boniface

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher DuckworthIT Innovation Centre, Digital Health and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. C.J.Duckworth@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0659-2177
Bethany CliffeSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Brian PickeringIT Innovation Centre, Digital Health and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ben AinsworthSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-1092
Alison Blythinmy mHealth Limited, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6080-0120
Adam Kirkmy mHealth Limited, London, UK.
Thomas M A Wilkinsonmy mHealth Limited, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1771-3851
Michael J BonifaceIT Innovation Centre, Digital Health and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) AI_AWARD02200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile Health (mHealth) has the potential to be transformative in the management of chronic conditions. Machine learning can leverage self-reported data collected with apps to predict periods of increased health risk, alert users, and signpost interventions. Despite this, mHealth must balance the treatment burden of frequent self-reporting and predictive performance and safety. Here we report how user engagement with a widely used and clinically validated mHealth app, myCOPD (designed for the self-management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), directly impacts the performance of a machine learning model predicting an acute worsening of condition (i.e., exacerbations). We classify how users typically engage with myCOPD, finding that 60.3% of users engage frequently, however, less frequent users can show transitional engagement (18.4%), becoming more engaged immediately ( < 21 days) before exacerbating. Machine learning performed better for users who engaged the most, however, this performance decrease can be mostly offset for less frequent users who engage more near exacerbation. We conduct interviews and focus groups with myCOPD users, highlighting digital diaries and disease acuity as key factors for engagement. Users of mHealth can feel overburdened when self-reporting data necessary for predictive modelling and confidence of recognising exacerbations is a significant barrier to accurate self-reported data. We demonstrate that users of mHealth should be encouraged to engage when they notice changes to their condition (rather than clinically defined symptoms) to achieve data that is still predictive for machine learning, while reducing the likelihood of disengagement through desensitisation.

Identifiers

PMID38472270
PMCPMC10933254
OpenAlexW4392886178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.