ArticleScientific reports2024
Improved estimation of the relationship between fetal growth and late stillbirth in the United States, 2014-15.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How AI can be used to promote public and population health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the United States the rate of stillbirth after 28 weeks' gestation (late stillbirth) is 2.7/1000 births. Fetuses that are small for gestational age (SGA) or large for gestational age (LGA) are at increased risk of stillbirth. SGA and LGA are often categorized as growth or birthweight ≤ 10th and ≥ 90th centile, respectively; however, these cut-offs are arbitrary. We sought to characterize the relationship between birthweight and stillbirth risk in greater detail. Data on singleton births between 28- and 44-weeks' gestation from 2014 to 2015 were extracted from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention live birth and fetal death files. Growth was assessed using customized birthweight centiles (Gestation Related Optimal Weight; GROW). The analyses included logistic regression using SGA/LGA categories and a generalized additive model (GAM) using birthweight centile as a continuous exposure. Although the SGA and LGA categories identified infants at risk of stillbirth, categorical models provided poor fits to the data within the high-risk bins, and in particular markedly underestimated the risk for the extreme centiles. For example, for fetuses in the lowest GROW centile, the observed rate was 39.8/1000 births compared with a predicted rate of 11.7/1000 from the category-based analysis. In contrast, the model-predicted risk from the GAM tracked closely with the observed risk, with the GAM providing an accurate characterization of stillbirth risk across the entire birthweight continuum. This study provides stillbirth risk estimates for each GROW centile, which clinicians can use in conjunction with other clinical details to guide obstetric management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.