Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472258›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Administrative data ICD-10 diagnostic codes identifies most lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 admissions but misses many discharged from the Emergency Department.

Cristiano S Moura, Laurie J Morrison, Corinne M Hohl, Lars Grant, Louise Pilote, Autumn Neville, Jeffrey P Hau, Sasha Bernatsky, and the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) investigators, Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Concordance between ICD-10-AM clinical coding and SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing for COVID-19 in Australian hospitals.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cristiano S MouraMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Laurie J MorrisonDepartment of Emergency Services, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Corinne M HohlVancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lars GrantMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Louise PiloteMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Autumn NevilleResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jeffrey P HauUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sasha BernatskyMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. sasha.bernatsky@mcgill.ca.
and the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) investigators
Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers
Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
McGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR 447679CIHR 464947CIHR 466880CIHR DMC-166262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimated the operating characteristics of ICD-10 code U07.1, introduced by the World Health Organization in 2020, to identify lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2. CCEDRRN is a national research registry of adults (March 2020-August 2021) with suspected/confirmed SARS-CoV-2 identified in Canadian emergency departments (EDs) using chart review (symptoms, clinical information, and lab test results including SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction, PCR results). CCEDRRN data were linked to administrative hospitalization discharge and ED ICD-10 diagnostic codes (accessed centrally via the Canadian Institute for Health Information). We identified ICD-10 diagnostic codes in CCEDRRN participants. We defined lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 based on at least one positive PCR in the 0-14 days before the ED presentation and/or during hospitalization (in those admitted from ED). We performed separate analyses for CCEDRRN participants discharged from ED and those hospitalized from the ED. Additional analyses were stratified by province, sex, age, and (for hospitalized patients) timing of the first PCR test. The sensitivity of ICD-10 code U07.1 for a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was 93.6% (95% CI 93.0-94.1%) in those hospitalized from ED and 83.0% (95% CI 82.1-83.9%) in those discharged from the ED. Sensitivity was similar across provinces and demographics, but in each stratified analysis, values were higher in those hospitalized versus those discharged from ED. The ICD-10 diagnostic code for U07.1 within administrative data identified most lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 within persons hospitalized from ED, although a significant number of cases discharged from ED were missed. This should be considered when using administrative data for research and public health planning.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultCanadaCOVID-19 TestingEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesPatient Discharge

Identifiers

PMID38472258
PMCPMC10933440
OpenAlexW4392886250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.