ArticleScientific reports2024
Classification and automatic scoring of arousal intensity during sleep stages using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revolutionizing Sleep Medicine: The Impact of Machine Learning on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Personalized Care.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Modalities in Sleep Disordered Breathing: Current and Emerging Technology and Its Potential to Transform Diagnostics.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arousal during sleep can result in sleep fragmentation and various physiological effects, impairing cognitive function and raising blood pressure and heart rate. However, the current definition of arousal has limitations in assessing both amplitude and duration, making it challenging to measure sleep fragmentation accurately. Moreover, there is inconsistency among inter-raters in arousal scoring, which renders it susceptible to subjective variability. Therefore, this study aims to identify a highly accurate classifier for each sleep stage by employing optimized feature selection and machine learning models. According to electroencephalography (EEG) signals during the arousal phase, the intensity level was categorized into four levels. For control, the non-arousal cases were used as level 0 and referred as sham arousal, resulting in five arousal intensity levels. Wavelet transform was applied to analyze sleep arousal to extract features from EEG. Based on these features, we classified arousal intensity levels through machine learning algorithms. Due to the different characteristics of EEG in each sleep stage, the classification model was optimized for the four sleep stages. Excluding sham arousals, a total of 13,532 arousal events were used. The lowest intensity in the entire data, level 1, was computed to be 3107, level 2 was 3384, level 3 was 3472, and the highest intensity of level 4 was 3,569. The optimized classification model for each sleep stage achieved an average sensitivity of 82.68%, specificity of 95.68%, and AUROC of 96.30%. The sensitivity of the control, arousal intensity level 0, was 83.07%, a 1.25% increase over the unoptimized model and a 14.22% increase over previous research. This study used machine learning techniques to develop classifiers for each sleep stage, improving the accuracy of arousal intensity classification. The classifiers showed high sensitivity and specificity and revealed the unique characteristics of arousal intensity during different sleep stages. These findings represent a novel approach to arousal research and have implications for developing more accurate predictive models in sleep research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.