Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472005›Full record

ArticleBurns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries2024

Consumer focus group testing with stakeholders to generate an enteral resuscitation training flipbook for primary health center and first-level hospital providers in Nepal.

Stephanie Francalancia, Kajal Mehta, Raslina Shrestha, Diwakar Phuyal, Das Bikash, Manish Yadav, Kiran Nakarmi, Shankar Rai, Sam Sharar, Barclay T Stewart and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie FrancalanciaBrown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: stephanie_francalancia@brown.edu.
Kajal MehtaDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Raslina ShresthaKirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Diwakar PhuyalKirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Das BikashKirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Manish YadavKirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kiran NakarmiKirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Shankar RaiKirtipur Hospital Phect Nepal Cleft and Burn Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sam ShararDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Barclay T StewartDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Trauma, Burn, and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gary FudemDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Patan Hospital · NPUniversity of Washington · USBrown University · US

Funding

NPGH LEADERs YR12: OBSSR (Greenberg, Ngwafong Mukere) & NIBIB (Lee)D43TW009345 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Dibyadyuti Datta, Chandy C. John · 2017 to 2026
$15.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnteral resuscitation (EResus) is operationally advantageous to intravenous resuscitation for burn-injured patients in some low-resource settings. However, there is minimal guidance and no training materials for EResus tailored to non-burn care providers. We aimed to develop and consumer-test a training flipbook with doctors and nurses in Nepal to aid broader dissemination of this life-saving technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used individual cognitive interviews with Nepali (n = 12) and international (n = 4) burn care experts to define key elements of EResus and specific concepts for its operationalization at primary health centers and first-level hospitals in Nepal. Content, prototype illustrations, and wireframe layouts were developed and revised with the burn care experts. Subsequently, eight consumer testing focus groups with Nepali stakeholders (5-10 people each) were facilitated. Prompts were generated using the Questionnaire Appraisal System (QAS) framework. The flipbook was iteratively revised and tested based on consumer feedback organized according to the domains of clarity, assumptions, knowledge/memory, and sensitivity/bias. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The flipbook elements were iterated until consumers made no additional requests for changes. Examples of consumer inputs included: clarity-minimize medical jargon, add shrunken organs and wilted plants to represent burn shock; assumptions-use locally representative figures, depict oral rehydration salts sachet instead of a graduated bottle; knowledge/memory-clarify complex topics, use Rule-of-9 s and depict approximately 20% total body surface area to indicate the threshold for resuscitation; sensitivity/bias-reduce anatomic illustration details (e.g. urinary catheter placement, body contours).

conclusionStakeholder engagement, consumer testing, and iterative revision can generate knowledge translation products that reflect contextually appropriate education materials for inexperienced burn providers. The EResus Training Flipbook can be used in Nepal and adapted to other contexts to facilitate the implementation of EResus globally.

Indexed as

BurnsFocus GroupsResuscitationHealth PersonnelHumansNepalPrimary Health CareStakeholder ParticipationBurnEnteral resuscitationImplementationInfographicLow- and middle-income countriesMedical Education

Identifiers

PMID38472005
PMCPMC11116054
OpenAlexW4391848524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.