Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38471987›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of anaesthesia2024

Monitoring of cerebral blood flow autoregulation: physiologic basis, measurement, and clinical implications.

Eric L Vu, Charles H Brown, Kenneth M Brady, Charles W Hogue

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric L VuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; The Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Charles H BrownDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kenneth M BradyThe Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Charles W HogueThe Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: charles.hogue@nm.org.
Northwestern University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Continuous Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring to Reduce Brain Injury from CardiacR01HL092259 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HOGUE, CHARLES W · 2009 to 2018
$3.4M
Monitoring Cerebral Autoregulation in Patients Undergoing Traumatic Hip Fracture Surgery to Improve Postoperative OutcomesK76AG057020 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, CHARLES HUGH · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
Cerebral Autoregulation in the Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit: Associations with Postoperative Delirium, Cognitive Change, and Biomarkers of Brain InjuryR01AG072387 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Charles Hugh Brown · 2025 to 2026
$748k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092259NIA NIH HHS K76 AG057020NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) autoregulation is the physiologic process whereby blood supply to the brain is kept constant over a range of cerebral perfusion pressures ensuring a constant supply of metabolic substrate. Clinical methods for monitoring CBF autoregulation were first developed for neurocritically ill patients and have been extended to surgical patients. These methods are based on measuring the relationship between cerebral perfusion pressure and surrogates of CBF or cerebral blood volume (CBV) at low frequencies (<0.05 Hz) of autoregulation using time or frequency domain analyses. Initially intracranial pressure monitoring or transcranial Doppler assessment of CBF velocity was utilised relative to changes in cerebral perfusion pressure or mean arterial pressure. A more clinically practical approach utilising filtered signals from near infrared spectroscopy monitors as an estimate of CBF has been validated. In contrast to the traditional teaching that 50 mm Hg is the autoregulation threshold, these investigations have found wide interindividual variability of the lower limit of autoregulation ranging from 40 to 90 mm Hg in adults and 20-55 mm Hg in children. Observational data have linked impaired CBF autoregulation metrics to adverse outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury, ischaemic stroke, subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage, and in surgical patients. CBF autoregulation monitoring has been described in both cardiac and noncardiac surgery. Data from a single-centre randomised study in adults found that targeting arterial pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass to above the lower limit of autoregulation led to a reduction of postoperative delirium and improved memory 1 month after surgery compared with usual care. Together, the growing body of evidence suggests that monitoring CBF autoregulation provides prognostic information on eventual patient outcomes and offers potential for therapeutic intervention. For surgical patients, personalised blood pressure management based on CBF autoregulation data holds promise as a strategy to improve patient neurocognitive outcomes.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationHomeostasisHumansIntracranial PressureMonitoring, PhysiologicSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranialautoregulationblood pressurecerebral blood flowcerebral perfusion pressuremonitoringnear infrared spectroscopyneurocognitive outcometranscranial Doppler

Identifiers

PMID38471987
PMCPMC13639459
OpenAlexW4392714798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.