Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38471566›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2024

Evolutionary change in flight-to-light response in urban moths comes with changes in wing morphology.

Evert Van de Schoot, Thomas Merckx, Dieter Ebert, Renate A Wesselingh, Florian Altermatt, Hans Van Dyck

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
23.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Evert Van de SchootEarth & Life Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve 1348, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0004-0134-0952
Thomas MerckxWILD, Biology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6195-3302
Dieter EbertDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2653-3772
Renate A WesselinghEarth & Life Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve 1348, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0241-2255
Florian AltermattDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4831-6958
Hans Van DyckEarth & Life Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve 1348, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2013-6824
UCLouvain · BEUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moths and other insects are attracted by artificial light sources. This flight-to-light behaviour disrupts their general activity focused on finding resources, such as mating partners, and increases predation risk. It thus has substantial fitness costs. In illuminated urban areas, spindle ermine moths

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsBiological EvolutionFlight, AnimalHumansWings, Animalanthropogenic changeartificial light at night (ALAN)flight-to-light behavioururban ecologyurban evolutionwing morphology

Identifiers

PMID38471566
PMCPMC10932693
OpenAlexW4392768501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.