Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38471544›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Dominance reversals: the resolution of genetic conflict and maintenance of genetic variation.

Karl Grieshop, Eddie K H Ho, Katja R Kasimatis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A century of theories of balancing selection.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reconciling theories of dominance with the relative rates of adaptive substitution on sex chromosomes and autosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. The resolution of evolutionary conflicts within species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karl GrieshopSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8925-5066
Eddie K H HoDepartment of Biology, Reed College, 3203 SE Woodstock Blvd, Portland, OR 97202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7692-394X
Katja R KasimatisDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A1.ORCID 0000-0003-0025-5022

Funding

National Sciences and Engineering Research CouncilSwedish Research CouncilUniversity of Toronto's Faculty of Arts and Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beneficial reversals of dominance reduce the costs of genetic trade-offs and can enable selection to maintain genetic variation for fitness. Beneficial dominance reversals are characterized by the beneficial allele for a given context (e.g. habitat, developmental stage, trait or sex) being dominant in that context but recessive where deleterious. This context dependence at least partially mitigates the fitness consequence of heterozygotes carrying one non-beneficial allele for their context and can result in balancing selection that maintains alternative alleles. Dominance reversals are theoretically plausible and are supported by mounting empirical evidence. Here, we highlight the importance of beneficial dominance reversals as a mechanism for the mitigation of genetic conflict and review the theory and empirical evidence for them. We identify some areas in need of further research and development and outline three methods that could facilitate the identification of antagonistic genetic variation (dominance ordination, allele-specific expression and allele-specific ATAC-Seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing)). There is ample scope for the development of new empirical methods as well as reanalysis of existing data through the lens of dominance reversals. A greater focus on this topic will expand our understanding of the mechanisms that resolve genetic conflict and whether they maintain genetic variation.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSelection, GeneticAllelesGenetic FitnessHeterozygoteModels, GeneticPhenotypeantagonistic pleiotropybalancing selectiondominance reversalgenetic conflictgenetic trade-offsgenetic variation

Identifiers

PMID38471544
PMCPMC10932723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.