Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38470960›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2025

Gerontechnologies, ethics, and care phases: Secondary analysis of qualitative interviews.

Andrea Martani, Yi Jiao Angelina Tian, Nadine Felber, Tenzin Wangmo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea MartaniUniversity of Basel.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-1002
Yi Jiao Angelina TianUniversity of Basel.ORCID 0000-0003-2969-9655
Nadine FelberUniversity of Basel.ORCID 0000-0001-8207-2996
Tenzin WangmoUniversity of Basel.ORCID 0000-0003-0857-0510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGerontechnologies are increasingly used in the care for older people. Many studies on their acceptability and ethical implications are conducted, but mainly from the perspective of principlism. This narrows our ethical gaze on the implications the use of these technologies have. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do participants speak about the impact that gerontechnologies have on the different phases of care, and care as a process? What are the moral implications from an ethic of care perspective? RESEARCH

designSecondary analysis of semi-structure interviews, whose segments on specific technologies were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Sixty-seven Swiss stakeholders involved in the use of gerontechnologies, including professional caregivers, informal caregivers, and older persons themselves. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The research study was evaluated by the Ethics Commission of Northwest and Central Switzerland (EKNZ). All participants received an information document before the interview date detailing the purpose, procedure, and anonymization measures. After explaining the study during the agreed upon interview time and upon receiving their written informed consent, the interview process began. FINDINGS/

resultsFour themes are identified: Identifying care needs, Taking responsibility, Hands-on work, Responding to care. As part of these themes, many codes highlighting the ambivalent impact of gerontechnologies are created, ranging from 'Expanded capacity for…identifying care needs' to 'Create new & (un)necessary…hands-on work'. The moral implications of these results from the care ethics perspective are discussed, through the ethical elements of: attentiveness, responsibility, competence, and responsiveness.

conclusionsThe moral implications of gerontechnologies on care phases from the care ethics perspective open up several questions on whether they actually help give care a central role in social life and provide more competent care.

Indexed as

GeriatricsAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwitzerlandCaregivingethics of caregerontechnologyolder personsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38470960
PMCPMC11771086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.