Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38470880›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Time series classification of multi-channel nerve cuff recordings using deep learning.

Aseem Partap Singh Gill, Jose Zariffa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aseem Partap Singh GillInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9525-8500
Jose ZariffaInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8842-745X
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurostimulation and neural recording are crucial to develop neuroprostheses that can restore function to individuals living with disabilities. While neurostimulation has been successfully translated into clinical use for several applications, it remains challenging to robustly collect and interpret neural recordings, especially for chronic applications. Nerve cuff electrodes offer a viable option for recording nerve signals, with long-term implantation success. However, nerve cuff electrodes' signals have low signal-to-noise ratios, resulting in reduced selectivity between neural pathways. The objective of this study was to determine whether deep learning techniques, specifically networks tailored for time series applications, can increase the recording selectivity achievable using multi-contact nerve cuff electrodes. We compared several neural network architectures, the impact and trade-off of window length on classification performance, and the benefit of data augmentation. Evaluation was carried out using a previously collected dataset of 56-channel nerve cuff recordings from the sciatic nerve of Long-Evans rats, which included afferent signals evoked using three types of mechanical stimuli. Through this study, the best model achieved an accuracy of 0.936 ± 0.084 and an F1-score of 0.917 ± 0.103, using 50 ms windows of data and an augmented training set. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of applying CNNs designed for time-series data to peripheral nerve recordings, and provide insights into the relationship between window duration and classification performance in this application.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAnimalsElectrodesElectrodes, ImplantedRatsRats, Long-EvansSciatic NerveTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID38470880
PMCPMC10931496
OpenAlexW4392697008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.