Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38470870›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

AI-Aristotle: A physics-informed framework for systems biology gray-box identification.

Nazanin Ahmadi Daryakenari, Mario De Florio, Khemraj Shukla, George Em Karniadakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neurodatascience: Past, Present, and Future.Data science in science · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. From PINNs to PIKANs: recent advances in physics-informed machine learning.Machine learning for computational science and engineering · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Quantification of total uncertainty in the physics-informed reconstruction of CVSim-6 physiology.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nazanin Ahmadi DaryakenariCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2485-8987
Mario De FlorioDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2285-3074
Khemraj ShuklaDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
George Em KarniadakisDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9713-7120

Funding

Multifidelity and multiscale modeling of the spleen function in sickle cell disease with in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo validationsR01HL154150 · NHLBI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Pierre BUFFET, Ming Dao · 2020 to 2026
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL154150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering mathematical equations that govern physical and biological systems from observed data is a fundamental challenge in scientific research. We present a new physics-informed framework for parameter estimation and missing physics identification (gray-box) in the field of Systems Biology. The proposed framework-named AI-Aristotle-combines the eXtreme Theory of Functional Connections (X-TFC) domain-decomposition and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) with symbolic regression (SR) techniques for parameter discovery and gray-box identification. We test the accuracy, speed, flexibility, and robustness of AI-Aristotle based on two benchmark problems in Systems Biology: a pharmacokinetics drug absorption model and an ultradian endocrine model for glucose-insulin interactions. We compare the two machine learning methods (X-TFC and PINNs), and moreover, we employ two different symbolic regression techniques to cross-verify our results. To test the performance of AI-Aristotle, we use sparse synthetic data perturbed by uniformly distributed noise. More broadly, our work provides insights into the accuracy, cost, scalability, and robustness of integrating neural networks with symbolic regressors, offering a comprehensive guide for researchers tackling gray-box identification challenges in complex dynamical systems in biomedicine and beyond.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPhysicsSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID38470870
PMCPMC10931529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.