ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Improved Method for Electron Powder Diffraction-Based Rietveld Analysis of Nanomaterials.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiphase nanomaterials are of increasing importance in material science. Providing reliable and statistically meaningful information on their average nanostructure is essential for synthesis control and applications. In this paper, we propose a novel procedure that simplifies and makes more effective the electron powder diffraction-based Rietveld analysis of nanomaterials. Our single step in-TEM method allows to obtain the instrumental broadening function of the TEM directly from a single measurement without the need for an additional X-ray diffraction measurement. Using a multilayer graphene calibration standard and applying properly controlled acquisition conditions on a spherical aberration-corrected microscope, we achieved the instrumental broadening of ±0.01 Å in terms of interplanar spacing. The shape of the diffraction peaks is modeled as a function of the scattering angle using the Caglioti relation, and the obtained parameters for instrumental broadening can be directly applied in the Rietveld analysis of electron diffraction data of the analyzed specimen. During peak shape analysis, the instrumental broadening parameters of the TEM are controlled separately from nanostructure-related peak broadening effects, which contribute to the higher reliability of nanostructure information extracted from electron diffraction patterns. The potential of the proposed procedure is demonstrated through the Rietveld analysis of hematite nanopowder and two-component Cu-Ni nanocrystalline thin film specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.