ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024
WISE: whole-scenario embryo identification using self-supervised learning encoder in IVF.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A foundational model for in vitro fertilization trained on 18 million time-lapse images.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study the effectiveness of whole-scenario embryo identification using a self-supervised learning encoder (WISE) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) on time-lapse, cross-device, and cryo-thawed scenarios.
methodsWISE was based on the vision transformer (ViT) architecture and masked autoencoders (MAE), a self-supervised learning (SSL) method. To train WISE, we prepared three datasets including the SSL pre-training dataset, the time-lapse identification dataset, and the cross-device identification dataset. To identify whether pairs of images were from the same embryos in different scenarios in the downstream identification tasks, embryo images including time-lapse and microscope images were first pre-processed through object detection, cropping, padding, and resizing, and then fed into WISE to get predictions.
resultsWISE could accurately identify embryos in the three scenarios. The accuracy was 99.89% on the time-lapse identification dataset, and 83.55% on the cross-device identification dataset. Besides, we subdivided a cryo-thawed evaluation set from the cross-device test set to have a better estimation of how WISE performs in the real-world, and it reached an accuracy of 82.22%. There were approximately 10% improvements in cross-device and cryo-thawed identification tasks after the SSL method was applied. Besides, WISE demonstrated improvements in the accuracy of 9.5%, 12%, and 18% over embryologists in the three scenarios.
conclusionSSL methods can improve embryo identification accuracy even when dealing with cross-device and cryo-thawed paired images. The study is the first to apply SSL in embryo identification, and the results show the promise of WISE for future application in embryo witnessing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.