Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38470506›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Detection of urinary tract stones on submillisievert abdominopelvic CT imaging with deep-learning image reconstruction algorithm (DLIR).

Sarah Prod'homme, Roger Bouzerar, Thomas Forzini, Aurélien Delabie, Cédric Renard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah Prod'hommeDepartment of Radiology, Amiens University Hospital, 1 Rond-Point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
Roger BouzerarBiophysics and Image Processing Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Thomas ForziniDepartment of Urology and Transplantation, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Aurélien DelabieDepartment of Radiology, Amiens University Hospital, 1 Rond-Point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
Cédric RenardDepartment of Radiology, Amiens University Hospital, 1 Rond-Point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France. renard.cedric@chu-amiens.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2288-6960
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrolithiasis is a chronic condition that leads to repeated CT scans throughout the patient's life. The goal was to assess the diagnostic performance and image quality of submillisievert abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) using deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in urolithiasis.

methods57 patients with suspected urolithiasis underwent both non-contrast low-dose (LD) and ULD abdominopelvic CT. Raw image data of ULD CT were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V 70%) and high-strength-level DLIR (DLIR-H). The performance of ULD CT for the detection of urinary stones was assessed by two readers and compared with LD CT with ASIR-V 70% as a reference standard. Image quality was assessed subjectively and objectively.

results266 stones were detected in 38 patients. Mean effective dose was 0.59 mSv for ULD CT and 1.96 mSv for LD CT. For diagnostic performance, sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 94%, respectively, for ULDCT with DLIR-H. There was an almost perfect intra-observer concordance on ULD CT with DLIR-H versus LDCT with ASIR-V 70% (ICC = 0.90 and 0.90 for the two readers). Image noise was significantly lower and signal-to-noise ratio significantly higher with DLIR-H compared to ASIR-V 70%. Subjective image quality was also significantly better with ULDCT with DLIR-H.

conclusionULD CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction maintains a good diagnostic performance in urolithiasis, with better image quality than hybrid iterative reconstruction and a significant radiation dose reduction.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrinary CalculiAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRadiography, AbdominalRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityComputed tomographyDeep learningImage enhancementRadiation doseUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID38470506
OpenAlexW4392717049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.