Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38470449›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

No gadolinium K-edge detected on the first clinical photon-counting computed tomography scanner.

Erik Baubeta, Eva Laurin Gadsböll, Leon Will, Fredrik Holmquist, Marie-Louise Aurumskjöld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Regards to Baubeta et al. JACMP 25(4), e14324.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erik BaubetaDepartment of Imaging and Functional Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-7322
Eva Laurin GadsböllDepartment of Imaging and Functional Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Leon WillDepartment of Imaging and Functional Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik HolmquistDepartment of Imaging and Functional Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Marie-Louise AurumskjöldMedical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

Swedish governmental funding of clinical research (ALF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to elucidate whether gadolinium contrast in clinically relevant doses can be used with photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) as an alternative contrast agent in clinical applications. MATERIAL/

methodsA CTDI phantom with 3D printed rods filled with different concentrations of gadolinium and iodine contrast was scanned in a PCCT and an energy-integrated computed tomography (EICT). Attenuation values at different monoenergetic steps were extracted for each contrast concentration.

resultsFor PCCT, gadolinium reached an attenuation >100 HU (103 HU) at 40 keV with a concentration 5 mmol/L whereas the same level was reached at 50 keV (118 HU) for 10 mmol/L and 90 keV (114 HU) for 25 mmol/L. For iodine, the same level of attenuation was reached at 100 keV (106 HU) with a concentration 8.75 mg I/mL. For EICT the lowest gadolinium contrast concentration needed to reach >100 HU (108 HU) was 10 mmol/L at 50 keV. For 25 mmol/L 100 HU was reached at 100 keV. For iodine contrast 108 HU was reached at 110 keV for 8.75 mg I/mL.

conclusionNo K-edge potential or difference in attenuation curves between iodine and gadolinium contrast is detected on the first clinical available PCCT. Clinically relevant attenuation levels were barely achieved in this setting with gadolinium concentrations approved for human use. The results of this study suggest that, given current scanning technology, gadolinium is not a clinically useful contrast agent for computed tomography because no K-edge was detected.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaIodineGadoliniumHumansPhantoms, ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaGadoliniumIodinecomputed tomographyEICTenergy integrated computed tomographygadolinium contrast agentiodine contrast agentK‐edgematerial decompositionPCCTphoton counting computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID38470449
PMCPMC11005964
OpenAlexW4392701180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.