ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
The 6-Item Vision-Related Quality of Life and Limitations Questionnaire: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We developed the Vision-related Quality of life and Limitations Questionnaire (VQL-6), a screening instrument to signal a need for additional care resulting from reduced vision-related quality of life in patients with chronic ophthalmic diseases. The aim of the present study was to evaluate psychometric properties. Methods: A Dutch population-based sample of 2032 participants (mean age, 55 ± 19 years) completed the VQL-6 and other questionnaires on vision-related quality of life, executive functioning, attention, mental health, and symptom validity. In addition, we recruited a sample of 208 ophthalmic patients (mean age, 72 ± 12 years) and 98 age and gender similar controls (mean age, 69 ± 11 years) who completed the VQL-6 and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. We studied the factor structure, internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity, and known-groups validity. Results: For the factor analyses, the population-based sample was split randomly in two subsamples. Exploratory factor analysis on the first subsample suggested a two-factor model (visual limitations and general health and quality of life), which was supported by confirmatory factor analyses on the second subsample, and on the patients. The VQL-6 demonstrated good internal consistency within each factor (0.78-0.89), sufficient convergent (r2= 55%) and divergent validity (r2 = 11%-24%), and good known-groups validity (Cohen's r = 0.57; P < 0.001). Conclusions: The VQL-6 has a robust two-factor structure and seems to be a valid tool to assess vision-related quality of life. Additional validation is needed in patients with chronic ophthalmic diseases. Translational Relevance: Future research is needed to determine if the VQL-6 can be used to identify patients with chronic ophthalmic diseases who are in need of additional care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.