Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38470243›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Neural attentional filters and behavioural outcome follow independent individual trajectories over the adult lifespan.

Sarah Tune, Jonas Obleser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah TuneCenter of Brain, Behavior, and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-9965
Jonas ObleserCenter of Brain, Behavior, and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7619-0459

Funding

European Research Council ERC-CoG-2014-646696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preserved communication abilities promote healthy ageing. To this end, the age-typical loss of sensory acuity might in part be compensated for by an individual's preserved attentional neural filtering. Is such a compensatory brain-behaviour link longitudinally stable? Can it predict individual change in listening behaviour? We here show that individual listening behaviour and neural filtering ability follow largely independent developmental trajectories modelling electroencephalographic and behavioural data of

Indexed as

AgingLongevityAdultAuditory PerceptionBenchmarkingBrainHumansageingauditory attentionEEGhumanlatent change score modelsneural speech trackingneurosciencespeech perception

Identifiers

PMID38470243
PMCPMC10932541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.