Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38469858›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2024

Radiographic Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohamed Kamal Mesregah, Melissa Baker, Camilla Yoon, Hans-Joerg Meisel, Patrick Hsieh, Jeffrey C Wang, S Tim Yoon, Zorica Buser, AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative disc disease: a retrospective, two-center comparative analysis of stand-alone cage versus cage-plate constructs.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Development and validation of a deep learning radiomics model for predicting adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamed Kamal MesregahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Menoufia University Faculty of Medicine, Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8047-9159
Melissa BakerGerling Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Camilla YoonDepartment of Orthopedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hans-Joerg MeiselDepartment of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3838-1489
Patrick HsiehDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7206-4842
Jeffrey C WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
S Tim YoonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1010-6952
Zorica BuserGerling Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5680-0643
AO Spine Knowledge Forum DegenerativeAO Spine, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
University of Southern California · USEmory University · USBG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle · DEMenoufia University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

objectivesTo assess the radiographic risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine pathologies.

methodsPubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to December 2023. The primary inclusion criteria were degenerative spinal conditions treated with ACDF, comparing radiological parameters in patients with and without postoperative ASD. The radiographic parameters included intervertebral disc height, cervical sagittal alignment, sagittal segmental alignment, range of motion, segmental height, T1 slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and plate to disc distance (PPD). Risk of bias was assessed for all studies. The Cochrane Review Manager was utilized to perform the meta-analysis.

resultsFrom 7044 articles, 13 retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. Three studies had "not serious" bias and the other 10 studies had serious or very serious bias. The total number of patients in the included studies was 1799 patients. Five studies included single-level ACDF, 2 studies included multi-level ACDF, and 6 studies included single or multi-level ACDF. On meta-analysis, the significant risk factors associated with ASD development were reduced postoperative cervical lordosis (mean difference [MD] = 3.35°,

conclusionsDecreased postoperative cervical lordosis, greater change in cervical sagittal alignment and developmental cervical canal stenosis were associated with an increased risk of ASD following ACDF.

Indexed as

adjacent segment diseaseanterior cervical discectomy and fusioncanal stenosisradiographic parametersrisk factorssagittal alignment

Identifiers

PMID38469858
PMCPMC11418681
OpenAlexW4392706755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.