ArticleGenetics2024
Spatio-temporal modeling of high-throughput multispectral aerial images improves agronomic trait genomic prediction in hybrid maize.
Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The next frontier for genomic prediction is computational.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Next-generation translational genomics for developing future crops.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Predictive modeling, pattern recognition, and spatiotemporal representations of plant growth in simulated and controlled environments: A comprehensive review.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Genomic selection: Essence, applications, and prospects.The plant genome · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Design randomizations and spatial corrections have increased understanding of genotypic, spatial, and residual effects in field experiments, but precisely measuring spatial heterogeneity in the field remains a challenge. To this end, our study evaluated approaches to improve spatial modeling using high-throughput phenotypes (HTP) via unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. The normalized difference vegetation index was measured by a multispectral MicaSense camera and processed using ImageBreed. Contrasting to baseline agronomic trait spatial correction and a baseline multitrait model, a two-stage approach was proposed. Using longitudinal normalized difference vegetation index data, plot level permanent environment effects estimated spatial patterns in the field throughout the growing season. Normalized difference vegetation index permanent environment were separated from additive genetic effects using 2D spline, separable autoregressive models, or random regression models. The Permanent environment were leveraged within agronomic trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction either modeling an empirical covariance for random effects, or by modeling fixed effects as an average of permanent environment across time or split among three growth phases. Modeling approaches were tested using simulation data and Genomes-to-Fields hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) field experiments in 2015, 2017, 2019, and 2020 for grain yield, grain moisture, and ear height. The two-stage approach improved heritability, model fit, and genotypic effect estimation compared to baseline models. Electrical conductance and elevation from a 2019 soil survey significantly improved model fit, while 2D spline permanent environment were most strongly correlated with the soil parameters. Simulation of field effects demonstrated improved specificity for random regression models. In summary, the use of longitudinal normalized difference vegetation index measurements increased experimental accuracy and understanding of field spatio-temporal heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.