Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38469571›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Locus coeruleus features are linked to vagus nerve stimulation response in drug-resistant epilepsy.

Alexandre Berger, Elise Beckers, Vincent Joris, Gaëtan Duchêne, Venethia Danthine, Nicolas Delinte, Inci Cakiroglu, Siya Sherif, Enrique Ignacio Germany Morrison, Andres Torres Sánchez and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandre BergerDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Elise BeckersSleep and Chronobiology Laboratory, GIGA-Cyclotron Research Center-in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Vincent JorisDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Gaëtan DuchêneGE Center MR Applications, General Electric Healthcare, Diegem, Belgium.
Venethia DanthineDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas DelinteDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Inci CakirogluDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Siya SherifSleep and Chronobiology Laboratory, GIGA-Cyclotron Research Center-in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Enrique Ignacio Germany MorrisonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Andres Torres SánchezDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Benoit MacqInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Laurence DricotDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Gilles Vandewalle *Sleep and Chronobiology Laboratory, GIGA-Cyclotron Research Center-in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Riëm El Tahry *Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
UCLouvain · BEUniversity of Liège · BEInnoviris · BEMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system is thought to be involved in the clinical effects of vagus nerve stimulation. This system is known to prevent seizure development and induce long-term plastic changes, particularly with the release of norepinephrine in the hippocampus. However, the requisites to become responder to the therapy and the mechanisms of action are still under investigation. Using MRI, we assessed the structural and functional characteristics of the locus coeruleus and microstructural properties of locus coeruleus-hippocampus white matter tracts in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy responding or not to the therapy. Twenty-three drug-resistant epileptic patients with cervical vagus nerve stimulation were recruited for this pilot study, including 13 responders or partial responders and 10 non-responders. A dedicated structural MRI acquisition allowed

Indexed as

biomarkerepilepsylocus coeruleusmagnetic resonance imagingvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38469571
PMCPMC10926962
OpenAlexW4391783748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.