ArticleCureus2024
Maternal Obesity and Neonatal Metabolic Health: Insights Into Insulin Resistance.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heavy moms, wheezy kids: how maternal obesity harms breathing in offspring.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2026Review
- Associations of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index with pregnancy complications and infant adiposity at 6 months corrected age: a two-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Maternal obesity is a global health concern that leads to metabolic alterations in the offspring, making them vulnerable to metabolic disorders in adulthood. Early identification of such neonates would provide opportunities to positively alter modifiable risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) to prevent their occurrence later in life. Objectives This study aimed to assess and contrast insulin resistance (IR) levels in neonates born to mothers with obesity and those born to healthy, non-obese mothers. Methods This case-control study was conducted after approval from the institutional ethics committee. A total of 98 healthy, non-obese pregnant females were included in Group 1, and 68 obese pregnant females were included in Group 2. The participants were followed up until delivery and cord blood samples were collected after delivery. Neonatal glucose and insulin concentrations were estimated, and indices of IR such as homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI), and glucose-to-insulin ratio were calculated. Neonatal IR indices and anthropometric measurements were compared between the groups using the Z test and correlated with the maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) using Pearson's correlation. Additionally, Pearson's correlations were examined between neonatal IR indices and anthropometric measurements. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05. Results Neonates in Group 2 exhibited significantly higher anthropometric parameters and IR indices than those in Group 1. A statistically significant positive correlation was identified between maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, neonatal anthropometric parameters, and IR. Furthermore, a statistically significant positive correlation was observed between neonatal IR and the anthropometric parameters. Conclusion Neonates born to obese mothers exhibited higher anthropometric parameters and insulin resistance than those born to non-obese, healthy mothers. Assessment of IR at birth can help identify neonates who are at higher risk of developing NCD in later life. Timely promotion of a healthy lifestyle can reduce the occurrence of NCDs in later life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.