ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Multidisciplinary approach and treatment of acral and mucosal melanoma.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- KIT Mutations Are More Common in Mucosal than Acral Melanoma: A Case-Series of 152 Patients from a Single Centre.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Clinical and Histopathological Prognostic Factors for Disease-Free Survival in Early-Stage Acral and Non-Acral Cutaneous Melanoma: A Retrospective Asian Cohort Analysis.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- A new strategy for melanoma treatment: an investigation of the clinical value of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and oncolytic viruses.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Review
- Amelanotic Melanocytic Nevus of the Oral Cavity: A Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Combination Immunotherapy for Mucosal Melanoma: Molecular Mechanism, Research Status, and Future Directions.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Fabrication and functional validation of a hybrid biomimetic nanovaccine (HBNV) againstBioactive materials · 2025Article
- Acral Melanoma in Skin of Color: Current Insights and Future Directions: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acral and mucosal melanoma are uncommon variants of melanoma. Acral melanoma has an age-adjusted incidence of approximately 1.8 cases per million individuals per year, accounting for about 2% to 3% of all melanoma cases. On the other hand, mucosal melanoma, with an incidence of 2.2 cases per million per year, makes up around 1.3% of all melanoma cases. These melanomas, in addition to being biologically and clinically distinct from cutaneous melanoma, share certain clinical and pathologic characteristics. These include a more aggressive nature and a less favorable prognosis. Furthermore, they exhibit a different mutational pattern, with KIT mutations being more prevalent in acral and mucosal melanomas. This divergence in mutational patterns may partially account for the relatively poorer prognosis, particularly to immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review explores various aspects of acral and mucosal melanoma, including their clinical presentation, pathologic features, mutational profiles, current therapeutic approaches, outcomes associated with systemic therapy, and potential strategies to address resistance to existing treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.