Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38469048›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Geographical distribution and species variation of gut microbiota in small rodents from the agro-pastoral transition ecotone in northern China.

Yongzhen Wu, Taoxiu Zhou, Chen Gu, Baofa Yin, Shengmei Yang, Yunzeng Zhang, Ruiyong Wu, Wanhong Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gut Microbiome of Two Rodent Species (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yongzhen WuCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7808-7858
Taoxiu ZhouCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China.
Chen GuCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China.
Baofa YinCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China.
Shengmei YangCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China.
Yunzeng ZhangCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China.
Ruiyong WuCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China.
Wanhong WeiCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota of rodents is essential for survival and adaptation and is susceptible to various factors, ranging from environmental conditions to genetic predispositions. Nevertheless, few comparative studies have considered the contribution of species identity and geographic spatial distance to variations in the gut microbiota. In this study, a random sampling survey encompassing four rodent species (

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene sequencingdistance isolationgut microbiotarodent

Identifiers

PMID38469048
PMCPMC10926059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.