ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022
Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Visual Prognosis in Pediatric Endophthalmitis: A 232-Case Retrospective Study.
Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Visual Prognosis in Pediatric Endophthalmitis: A 232-Case Retrospective Study.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-16Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In infective endophthalmitis, once the patient's vision is seriously damaged, the damage to children's vision is particularly serious. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the etiology, epidemiology, treatment, and visual prognosis of children's endophthalmitis and to conduct an in-depth analysis. Results: A total of 232 cases were collected, with an average age of 6.33 ± 2.89 years (range 8months to 14 years). The most common etiologies were ocular trauma (93.5%) and previous ocular surgery (5.2%). Overall, 81 samples were sent to the microbiology department for direct smear and culture, from which 21 organisms were isolated. 28 cases (39.5%) were culture-positive. The most organism was Gram-positive organisms. In treatment, the proportion of PPV use combined with silicone oil filling had increased gradually in three phases, while the other treatments were almost decreased or nearly similar. The final visual result is 22 (9.5) in 20/200 or better, 65 (28.0) in CF-20/200, 38 (16.4) in hand move (HM), 27 (11.6) in light perception (LP), 21 (9.1) in no light perception (NLP), and 59 (25.4) did not match (NM). Conclusion: Penetrating ocular trauma is the most common cause of infectious endophthalmitis in children. The detection rate of microorganisms is low and helpless for the treatment. In this study, it was found that despite the aggressive treatments such as antibacterial and vitrectomy, the ultimate improvement in vision was highly undesirable.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.