ArticleCureus2024
Enzymatic Fat Dissolution Improves Detection of Small Lymph Nodes in Colon Cancer Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Accurate lymph node evaluation is essential for staging colon cancer and guiding postoperative treatment decisions. In this study, we compared the efficacy of a simple enzymatic fat dissolution method with the conventional method for lymph node sampling from specimens after colon cancer surgery. Methods We enrolled 58 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic surgery for colon adenocarcinoma between May 2018 and May 2021 at Fukuoka University Hospital in Fukuoka, Japan. The specimens from these patients were treated using fat dissolution and were compared with specimens from 58 patients for which conventional manual palpation was used. Results A significantly greater number of lymph nodes were detected by the fat dissolution method compared with the conventional method (average per patient, 27.5 vs. 22.6, P = 0.02). In particular, the between-group difference was significant for lymph nodes measuring <5 mm (average per patient, 26.1 vs. 20.9; P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that, compared with the conventional method, the fat dissolution method was significantly associated with the identification of lymph node metastasis. The positive rate of lymph nodes ≥10 mm in diameter was markedly higher along the inferior mesenteric artery than the ileocolic artery (100% vs. 52.6%). Conclusions The use of the fat dissolution method led to an increase in the number of small lymph nodes detected. Rates of metastasis according to lymph node size may depend on the lymph node station.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.