ArticleHeliyon2024
Identification of disease-specific bio-markers through network-based analysis of gene co-expression: A case study on Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving machine learning detection of Alzheimer disease using enhanced manta ray gene selection of Alzheimer gene expression datasets.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Finding biomarker genes for complex diseases attracts persistent attention due to its application in clinics. In this paper, we propose a network-based method to obtain a set of biomarker genes. The key idea is to construct a gene co-expression network among sensitive genes and cluster the genes into different modules. For each module, we can identify its representative, i.e., the gene with the largest connectivity and the smallest average shortest path length to other genes within the module. We believe these representative genes could serve as a new set of potential biomarkers for diseases. As a typical example, we investigated Alzheimer's disease, obtaining a total of 16 potential representative genes, three of which belong to the non-transcriptome. A total of 11 out of these genes are found in literature from different perspectives and methods. The incipient groups were classified into two different subtypes using machine learning algorithms. We subjected the two subtypes to Gene Ontology analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis with healthy groups and moderate groups, respectively. The two sub-type groups were involved in two different biological processes, demonstrating the validity of this approach. This method is disease-specific and independent; hence, it can be extended to classify other kinds of complex diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.