Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468929›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Pipeline failure evaluation and prediction using failure probability and neural network based on measured data.

H Noroznia, M Gandomkar, J Nikoukar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H NorozniaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Saveh, Iran.
M GandomkarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Saveh, Iran.
J NikoukarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Saveh, Iran.
Islamic Azad University Saveh · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemical corrosion of metals in large industries such as oil and gas is a fundamental and costly problem. Gas transmission and distribution pipes and the other structures submerged in the soil and in an electrolyte, according to the existing conditions and according to the metallurgical structure, are corroded, and after a period of work, they disrupt an active system and process and lead to loss. The worst corrosion that occurs for metals embedded in the soil is where there are stray electric currents. Based on this, the cathodic protection of metal pipes is known as the most effective protection method to prevent the corrosion of structures buried in the ground, which is widely used to protect the corrosion distribution and transmission pipes of gas, oil, and water. In gas networks, current and voltage measurements for cathodic protection are carried out and recorded in specific periods according to the standards approved by the National Gas Company. The effect of stray currents on the obtained results is significant. The reason for this is that the available data is recorded as a time series, and as a result, the critical value of this time series will significantly impact the remaining life of the gas pipelines. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to investigate the stray currents effect on failure rate using normal probability distribution. In the following, the estimation of the remaining useful life of gas pipelines under cathodic protection is obtained using neural networks and compared with the results of the failure probability to check the accuracy of the results. According to the data history of the equipment, the amount of failure and the remaining useful life of the gas pipelines will be obtained.

Indexed as

Cathodic protectionCondition monitoringFailure probabilityNeural networksRemaining lifeStray currents

Identifiers

PMID38468929
PMCPMC10925984
OpenAlexW4392059402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.