Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468915›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Assessment of a Clinical Test for Detection of Alteration in Visual Perception Due to Astigmatism.

Eyal Gal, Joan Gispets, Arnold Wilkins, Meira Zyroff, Efrat Netanya, Liat Gantz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Eyal GalDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.
Joan GispetsUniversity Vision Centre, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Arnold WilkinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Meira ZyroffDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.
Efrat NetanyaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.
Liat GantzDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9604-3528
Hadassah Academic College · ILUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ESUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Astigmatism blurs the retinal image of a circular spot along a particular orientation rendering it an elliptical shape. Astigmatic patients demonstrate adaptation to residual astigmatic blur that may affect their discrimination between oval and circular targets. The Wilkins Egg and Ball Test (WEBT) was created to detect altered visual perception due to residual astigmatic blur by discriminating a circle within a row of oval elements. This prospective, cross-sectional study examined the utility of WEBT in detecting uncorrected residual astigmatism on the perception of form symmetry in astigmatic and keratoconic participants as well as normal participants with induced astigmatism at four primary meridians. Methods: The mean search time (sT) and number of errors (noE) of 33 non-astigmatic controls (mean age: 24±5, range: 18-43, 6 males), 23 astigmatic participants (mean age: 36±12, range: 18-43, 6 males) and 13 keratoconic participants (N=22 eyes, mean age: 36±12, range: 18-58, 6 males) were measured under baseline, and 2.00 DC induced cylinder at four primary meridians, and for uncorrected, spherical-correction only, and fully corrected conditions, respectively. Mean sT and noE were converted to Z-scores, combined for each condition, and compared using repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc analysis. Results: Combined Z-scores for the controls were significantly worse (p<0.001) for all induced cylinder conditions. The induced 180° condition was significantly better than 45° and 90° conditions (p=0.04), but not the 135° condition. For both astigmatic and keratoconic cohorts, Z-scores of the uncorrected condition were significantly worse than the fully corrected condition (both p<0.01), but the fully corrected and spherical-only conditions did not differ significantly (p=0.06 and p=0.05, respectively). Conclusion: In accommodating young adults, WEBT detected altered visual perception due to overall blur, and moderate-high amounts of uncorrected induced astigmatism and keratoconus, but is not useful as a tool for detection of altered visual perception due to small residual astigmatic blur.

Indexed as

astigmatismkeratoconusnumber of errorssearch timevisual searchWilkins egg and ball test

Identifiers

PMID38468915
PMCPMC10926918
OpenAlexW4392559217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.