ReviewJournal of translational autoimmunity2024
Autoimmunity in centenarians. A paradox.
Review in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of Incident Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases with Second Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Versus Alternative Biologic Therapy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and First TNFi Exposure: A Real-World Cohort Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Biological age and immunosenescence in Colombian centenarians.npj aging · 2026Article
- The inner fire: the shifting paradigm of complement system in aging.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Preserved cognitive-functional phenotype in centenarians and its association with modifiable risk factors for dementia: Results from the Colombian centenarians project.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- The 'autoimmunome' of centenarians.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Article
- Disease Aggravation With Age in an Experimental Model of Multiple Sclerosis: Role of Immunosenescence.Aging cell · 2025Article
- Centenarians-the way to healthy vascular ageing and longevity: a review from VascAgeNet.GeroScience · 2025Review
- Exploring the Interplay between Cellular Senescence, Immunity, and Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: Challenges and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are one of the groups of chronic illnesses that impose a significant burden of disease and health costs worldwide. Age is a crucial risk factor for the onset of ADs. Theoretically, it is inferred that with organic and immune system aging, the loss of immune tolerance and specificity of immune activity becomes more intense, the probability of autoimmunity is increasing. However, there is a group of individuals whose prevalence of ADs is very low or non-existent, despite the biological aging. This paradox in autoimmunity raises questions. Centenarians, individuals who are over 100 years old, are possibly the most successful model of biological aging in humans. Most of these individuals exhibit a favorable health phenotype. To date, primary data evidence and potential hypotheses explaining this phenomenon are lacking globally, even though this paradox could provide valuable, original, and relevant information regarding the understanding of risk or protective factors, biological drivers, and biomarkers related to autoimmunity. Herein we discuss some hypothesis that may explain the absence of ADs in centenarians, including inflammaging, immunosenescence and immune resilience, immune system hyperstimulation, proteodynamics, and genetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.