Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468644›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2024

Personalized 3D-printed cranial implants for complex cranioplasty using open-source software.

Vjekoslav Kopačin, Vedran Zubčić, Ivan Mumlek, Dario Mužević, Alen Rončević, Ana-Maria Lazar, Ana Kvolik Pavić, Anamarija Soldo Koruga, Zdravka Krivdić, Ivana Martinović and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 3D-printed living implants: advancing cranial reconstruction.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vjekoslav KopačinDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Center, Osijek, Croatia.
Vedran ZubčićFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.
Ivan MumlekFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.
Dario MuževićFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.
Alen RončevićFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.
Ana-Maria LazarFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.
Ana Kvolik PavićFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.
Anamarija Soldo KorugaFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.
Zdravka KrivdićDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Center, Osijek, Croatia.
Ivana MartinovićDepartment of Information Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.
Nenad KorugaFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.
University of Osijek · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cranioplasty is a routine neurosurgery treatment used to correct cranial vault abnormalities. Utilization of 3D printing technology in the field of cranioplasty involving the reconstruction of cranial defects emerged as an advanced possibility of anatomical reshaping. The transformative impact of patient-specific 3D printed implants, focuses on their remarkable accuracy, customization capabilities, and enhanced biocompatibility. Methods: The precise adaptation of implants to patient-specific anatomies, even in complex cases we presented, result in improved aesthetic outcomes and reduced surgical complications. The ability to create highly customized implants addresses the functional aspects of cranial defects and considers the psychological impact on patients. Results: By combining technological innovation with personalized patient care, 3D printed cranioplasty emerges as a transformative avenue in cranial reconstruction, ultimately redefining the standards of success in neurosurgery. Conclusion: 3D printing allows an excellent cranioplasty cosmesis achieved at a reasonable price without sacrificing patient outcomes. Wider implementation of this strategy can lead to significant healthcare cost savings.

Indexed as

3D PrintingCranioplastyImplantOpen-sourcePatient carePersonalized medicinePolymethyl methacrylatePrecision medicinePrintingProstheticThree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID38468644
PMCPMC10927182
OpenAlexW4391684750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.