Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468444›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Fundamentally Manipulating the Electronic Structure of Polar Bifunctional Catalysts for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Heterojunction Design versus Doping Engineering.

Huifang Xu, Qingbin Jiang, Zheng Shu, Kwan San Hui, Shuo Wang, Yunshan Zheng, Xiaolu Liu, Huixian Xie, Weng-Fai Andy Ip, Chenyang Zha and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. MoFrontiers in chemistry · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Huifang XuJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Qingbin JiangJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Zheng ShuJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Kwan San HuiSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Shuo WangJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Yunshan ZhengJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Xiaolu LiuJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Huixian XieJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Weng-Fai Andy IpDepartment of Physics and Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau, 999078, China.
Chenyang ZhaJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Yongqing CaiJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Kwun Nam HuiJoint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3008-8571

Funding

Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR 0007/2021/AGJScience and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR 0022/2023/RIB1Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR 0032/2021/ITPScience and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR 0033/2023/ITP1Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR 0046/2019/AFJScience and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR 006/2022/ALCScience and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR 0070/2023/AFJScience and Technology Program of Guangdong Province of China 2022A0505030028University of Macau MYRG2020-00187-IAPMEUniversity of Macau MYRG2022-00223-IAPME
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterogeneous structures and doping strategies have been intensively used to manipulate the catalytic conversion of polysulfides to enhance reaction kinetics and suppress the shuttle effect in lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. However, understanding how to select suitable strategies for engineering the electronic structure of polar catalysts is lacking. Here, a comparative investigation between heterogeneous structures and doping strategies is conducted to assess their impact on the modulation of the electronic structures and their effectiveness in catalyzing the conversion of polysulfides. These findings reveal that Co

Indexed as

active sitesdoping strategieselectronic structuresheterogeneous structurespolar catalysts

Identifiers

PMID38468444
PMCPMC11132031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.