Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468319›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Personalized, interdisciplinary patient pathway for cross-sector care of multimorbid patients (eliPfad trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Christoph Heinrich Lindemann, Volker Burst, Linus Alexander Völker, Sebastian Brähler, Dusan Simic, Ingrid Becker, Martin Hellmich, Clarissa Kurscheid, Nadine Scholten, Ruben Krauspe and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph Heinrich Lindemann *Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Volker Burst *Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Linus Alexander VölkerDepartment II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sebastian BrählerDepartment II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Dusan SimicCologne Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ingrid BeckerInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin HellmichInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Clarissa KurscheidResearch Institute for Health and System Development, EUFH University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany.
Nadine ScholtenFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Chair for Health Services Research, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ruben KrauspeCologne Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Kerstin LeibelCologne Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stephanie Stock *Cologne Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Paul Thomas Brinkkoetter *Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. paul.brinkkoetter@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4287-2080
University of Cologne · DEEuropean University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss 01NVF21114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultimorbid and frail elderly patients often carry a high burden of treatment. Hospitalization due to the onset of an acute illness can disrupt the fragile balance, resulting in further readmissions after hospital discharge. Current models of care in Germany do not meet the needs of this patient group. Rather lack of coordination and integration of care combined with a lack of interdisciplinary approaches result in fragmented and inadequate care and increase the burden of treatment even more.

methodseliPfad is a randomized controlled trial conducted in 6 hospitals in Germany. Multimorbid elderly patients aged 55 or older are randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Patients in the intervention group receive the eliPfad intervention additional to standard care. The core components of eliPfad are: Early assessment of patients' individual treatment burden and support through a specially trained case manager Involvement of the patient's general practitioner (GP) right from the beginning of the hospital stay Preparation of an individual, cross-sectoral treatment plan through the interdisciplinary hospital team with the involvement of the patient's GP Establishment of a cross-sectoral electronic patient record (e-ePA) for documentation and cross-sectoral exchange Support/Promote patient adherence Tailored early rehabilitation during the hospital stay, which is continued at home Close-tele-monitoring of medically meaningful vital parameters through the use of tablets, digital devices, and personal contacts in the home environment The intervention period begins in the hospital and continues 6 weeks after discharge. Patients in the control group will be treated according to standard clinical care and discharged according to current discharge management. The primary aim is the prevention/reduction of readmissions in the first 6 months after discharge. In addition, the impact on health-related quality of life, the burden of treatment, survival, self-management, medication prescription, health literacy, patient-centered care, cost-effectiveness, and process evaluation will be examined. Nine hundred forty-eight patients will be randomized 1:1 to intervention and control group. DISCUSSION: If eliPfad leads to fewer readmissions, proves (cost-)effective, and lowers the treatment burden, it should be introduced as a new standard of care in the German healthcare system.

trial registrationThe trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS)) on 08/14/2023 under the ID DRKS00031500 .

Indexed as

HospitalizationQuality of LifeAgedDelivery of Health CareFrail ElderlyHumansMiddle AgedPatient DischargeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCase managementChronic diseasese-healthGeriatricsHealth services researchMultimorbidityRandomized controlled trialRehospitalizationStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID38468319
PMCPMC10926660
OpenAlexW4392652538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.