Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468224›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Text analysis framework for identifying mutations among non-small cell lung cancer patients from laboratory data.

Amman Yusuf, Devon J Boyne, Dylan E O'Sullivan, Darren R Brenner, Winson Y Cheung, Imran Mirza, Tamer N Jarada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amman YusufDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N2, Canada.
Devon J BoyneDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N2, Canada.
Dylan E O'SullivanDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N2, Canada.
Darren R BrennerDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N2, Canada.
Winson Y CheungDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N2, Canada.
Imran MirzaAlberta Precision Laboratories, Calgary, AB, T2L 2K8, Canada.
Tamer N JaradaDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N2, Canada. tnjarada@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaboratory data can provide great value to support research aimed at reducing the incidence, prolonging survival and enhancing outcomes of cancer. Data is characterized by the information it carries and the format it holds. Data captured in Alberta's biomarker laboratory repository is free text, cluttered and rouge. Such data format limits its utility and prohibits broader adoption and research development. Text analysis for information extraction of unstructured data can change this and lead to more complete analyses. Previous work on extracting relevant information from free text, unstructured data employed Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML), rule-based Information Extraction (IE) methods, or a hybrid combination between them.

methodsIn our study, text analysis was performed on Alberta Precision Laboratories data which consisted of 95,854 entries from the Southern Alberta Dataset (SAD) and 6944 entries from the Northern Alberta Dataset (NAD). The data covers all of Alberta and is completely population-based. Our proposed framework is built around rule-based IE methods. It incorporates topics such as Syntax and Lexical analyses to achieve deterministic extraction of data from biomarker laboratory data (i.e., Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) test results). Lexical analysis compromises of data cleaning and pre-processing, Rich Text Format text conversion into readable plain text format, and normalization and tokenization of text. The framework then passes the text into the Syntax analysis stage which includes the rule-based method of extracting relevant data. Rule-based patterns of the test result are identified, and a Context Free Grammar then generates the rules of information extraction. Finally, the results are linked with the Alberta Cancer Registry to support real-world cancer research studies.

resultsOf the original 5512 entries in the SAD dataset and 5017 entries in the NAD dataset which were filtered for EGFR, the framework yielded 5129 and 3388 extracted EGFR test results from the SAD and NAD datasets, respectively. An accuracy of 97.5% was achieved on a random sample of 362 tests.

conclusionsWe presented a text analysis framework to extract specific information from unstructured clinical data. Our proposed framework has shown that it can successfully extract relevant information from EGFR test results.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsBiomarkersElectronic Health RecordsErbB ReceptorsHumansLaboratoriesMutationNADNatural Language ProcessingBiomarkersErbB ReceptorsNADContext free grammarEGFRInformation extractionLaboratory dataLexical analysisNSCLCSyntax analysisText analysis

Identifiers

PMID38468224
PMCPMC10926579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.