ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Machine Learning for Biological Design.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natural History Collections at the Crossroads: Shifting Priorities and Data-Driven Opportunities.Ecology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We briefly present machine learning approaches for designing better biological experiments. These approaches build on machine learning predictors and provide additional tools to guide scientific discovery. There are two different kinds of objectives when designing better experiments: to improve the predictive model or to improve the experimental outcome. We survey five different approaches for adaptive experimental design that iteratively search the space of possible experiments while adapting to measured data. The approaches are Bayesian optimization, bandits, reinforcement learning, optimal experimental design, and active learning. These machine learning approaches have shown promise in various areas of biology, and we provide broad guidelines to the practitioner and links to further resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38468097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.