Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468028›Full record

ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024

Multifractal Analysis in Neuroimaging.

Renaud Lopes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
33.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Computational Fractal-Based Neurosurgery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renaud LopesInserm, U1172-LilNCog-Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, University of Lille, Lille, France. renaud.lopes@univ-lille.fr.
Université de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characteristics of biomedical signals are not captured by conventional measures like the average amplitude of the signal. The methodologies derived from fractal geometry have been a very useful approach to study the degree of irregularity of a signal. The monofractal analysis of a signal is defined by a single power-law exponent in assuming a scale invariance in time and space. However, temporal and spatial variation in the scale-invariant structure of the biomedical signal often appears. In this case, multifractal analysis is well-suited because it is defined by a multifractal spectrum of power-law exponents. There are several approaches to the implementation of this analysis, and there are numerous ways to present these.In this chapter, we review the use of multifractal analysis for the purpose of characterizing signals in neuroimaging. After describing the tenets of multifractal analysis, we present several approaches to estimating the multifractal spectrum. Finally, we describe the applications of this spectrum on biomedical signals in the characterization of several diseases in neurosciences.

Indexed as

FractalsNeuroimagingHumansBrain imagingElectroencephalogramMultifractal analysisMultifractal spectrumNeurological diseases

Identifiers

PMID38468028
OpenAlexW4392720118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.