Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38468023›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Fixation-related potentials during mobile map assisted navigation in the real world: The effect of landmark visualization style.

Christopher Hilton, Armand Kapaj, Sara Irina Fabrikant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Contribution of Spatially Tuned Brain Cells to Human Navigation Performance.KN - journal of cartography and geographic information · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher HiltonGeographic Information Visualization & Analysis (GIVA), Department of Geography, University of Zurich- Irchel, Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland. c.hilton@tu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-6935
Armand KapajGeographic Information Visualization & Analysis (GIVA), Department of Geography, University of Zurich- Irchel, Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1785-7348
Sara Irina FabrikantGeographic Information Visualization & Analysis (GIVA), Department of Geography, University of Zurich- Irchel, Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1263-8792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An often-proposed enhancement for mobile maps to aid assisted navigation is the presentation of landmark information, yet understanding of the manner in which they should be displayed is limited. In this study, we investigated whether the visualization of landmarks as 3D map symbols with either an abstract or realistic style influenced the subsequent processing of those landmarks during route navigation. We utilized a real-world mobile electroencephalography approach to this question by combining several tools developed to overcome the challenges typically encountered in real-world neuroscience research. We coregistered eye-movement and EEG recordings from 45 participants as they navigated through a real-world environment using a mobile map. Analyses of fixation event-related potentials revealed that the amplitude of the parietal P200 component was enhanced when participants fixated landmarks in the real world that were visualized on the mobile map in a realistic style, and that frontal P200 latencies were prolonged for landmarks depicted in either a realistic or abstract style compared with features of the environment that were not presented on the map, but only for the male participants. In contrast, we did not observe any significant effects of landmark visualization style on visual P1-N1 peaks or the parietal late positive component. Overall, the findings indicate that the cognitive matching process between landmarks seen in the environment and those previously seen on a map is facilitated by more realistic map display, while low-level perceptual processing of landmarks and recall of associated information are unaffected by map visualization style.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsFixation, OcularPattern Recognition, VisualSpatial NavigationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleParietal LobeYoung AdultFixation related potentialsMobile EEGNavigation assistancePrimingSpatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID38468023
PMCPMC11845534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.