Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38467929›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024

Letter to editor: Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.

Syeda Mahrukh Fatima Zaidi, Faizan Ur Rehman, Burhanuddin Sohail Rangwala

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Syeda Mahrukh Fatima ZaidiDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. mahrukhfatima2010@live.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1723-4097
Faizan Ur RehmanDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Burhanuddin Sohail RangwalaJinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKJinnah Sindh Medical University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a critical analysis of complications following cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive hemicraniectomy, focusing on autologous, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and computer-aided design (CAD) implants. The analysis encompasses a retrospective bicenter assessment, evaluating factors influencing surgical outcomes and emphasizing the significance of material selection in minimizing postoperative complications. The study's comprehensive examination of complication rates associated with various implant materials contributes significantly to understanding CP outcomes. While polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and autologous bone flaps (ABFs) exhibited higher rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and explantation, a meta-analysis revealed a contrasting lower infection rate for polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants. The study underscores the critical role of material selection in mitigating postoperative complications. Despite its strengths, the study's retrospective design, reliance on data from two centers, and limited sample size pose limitations. Future research should prioritize prospective, multicenter studies with standardized protocols to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy in CP procedures.

Indexed as

Decompressive CraniectomyPolymethyl MethacrylateComputer-Aided DesignHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSkullPolymethyl MethacrylateComplicationsCranioplastyDecompressive hemicraniectomy

Identifiers

PMID38467929
OpenAlexW4392711585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.